Why MBA programmes don’t work for women leaders
In the first of a series of guest blog posts, we’re delighted that executive coach and mediation specialist, Liz Rivers, has kindly agreed for us to publish a thought piece she recently posted on her own website.
A female General Counsel friend recently told me about the MBA she did to boost her leadership skills. She was advised to develop a leadership style where she had “no good days, no bad days”, to be the same every day and present a smooth and even face to her team and colleagues.
I profoundly disagree. I remember the tyranny when I was a young lawyer of being “professional”. The strong implicit message that I had to be the same every day, never admit to any vulnerability or heaven forbid show any emotions, instead to robotically churn out the work at a consistent rate day after day.
The Industrial Age has given us a mechanistic view of organisations and their workers – as machines consisting of components that can easily be replaced. Our flesh and blood nature is seen as a weakness rather than a strength. This also encourages a worldview that allows us to see “the environment” as separate from us and “out there”, with disastrous consequences. It is time to embrace our flesh and blood nature and see this as a source of power rather than weakness. Nature moves in cycles and everything has an ebb and flow. When we respect these rhythms we can use our energy much more effectively. When we seek to override them we ultimately pay the price for this in stress, lack of engagement and organisations that operate in ways that are detrimental to society and the Earth.
For women leaders it is particularly important to respect the ebb and flow of our energy and refuse to see it as a sign of weakness. Pay attention to how your energy fluctuates through the course of the month and give yourself permission to rest when you need to. Be a role model for this. Challenging the norm in this small way can have profound consequences.
And MBA programmes take note – it is time to leave the Industrial Age behind.
Do you agree with Liz’s view? We’d love to hear from you so please leave a comment below or email firstname.lastname@example.org